<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
< oai_dc:dc schemaLocation =" http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd " >
< dc:title lang =" en-US " > BOLIVIA IN 1904. WHY DO THEY SIGN THE TREATY WITH CHILE? </ dc:title >
< dc:title lang =" es-ES " > BOLIVIA EN 1904. ¿POR QUÉ FIRMA EL TRATADO CON CHILE? </ dc:title >
< dc:creator > CORREA VERA, LORETO </ dc:creator >
< dc:creator > SALAS MATURANA, ALEJANDRO </ dc:creator >
< dc:subject lang =" en-US " > Acre Treaty; Treaty of Peace of 1904; Bolivia; Railways; International Relations </ dc:subject >
< dc:subject lang =" es-ES " > Tratado del Acre; Tratado de Paz de 1904; Bolivia; Ferrocarriles; Relaciones Internacionales </ dc:subject >
< dc:description lang =" en-US " > This article demonstrates that Bolivia - despite the negotiations of 1895 and all the recent rhetoric - was not worried of the effective recovery of the coast until long after the signing of the 1904 Treaty, instead of that, the presidency of Ismael Montes and the rise of Liberals in the Bolivian state, prioritized the modernization of the country and the search for ways to get the production of tin at any cost, at that time, the main wealth of Bolivia. This text has the purpose of explaining –as a witness of the time-, what were the reasons that the Bolivian authorities wielded before their people to sign the Treaty of Peace with Chile. Following that logic and notwithstanding all the recent literature, it seems appropriate to go beyond the subjective line of interpretation to establish the sayings of the main actors. </ dc:description >
< dc:description lang =" es-ES " > Este artículo demuestra que Bolivia no estuvo preocupada –pese a las negociaciones de 1895 y a toda la retórica reciente- de la recuperación efectiva del litoral sino hasta mucho después del rmado el Tratado de 1904. En efecto, la presidencia de Ismael Montes y el ascenso de los liberales en el Estado boliviano, priorizaron la modernización del país y la búsqueda de formas para sacar la producción de estaño a cualquier costo, por aquel entonces, la principal riqueza de Bolivia. Este texto tiene el propósito de explicar -cual ciudadano de la época-, cuáles fueron los motivos que las autoridades bolivianas esgrimieron ante la ciudadanía para rmar el Tratado de Paz con Chile. En esta línea, y no obstante toda la literatura reciente, nos parece oportuno traspasar la subjetiva línea de interpretación para establecer los dichos de los protagonistas. </ dc:description >
< dc:publisher lang =" es-ES " > Academia Nacional de Estudios Políticos y Estratégicos </ dc:publisher >
< dc:date > 2017-12-27 </ dc:date >
< dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ dc:type >
< dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion </ dc:type >
< dc:format > application/pdf </ dc:format >
< dc:format > text/html </ dc:format >
< dc:identifier > https://www.politicayestrategia.cl/index.php/rpye/article/view/128 </ dc:identifier >
< dc:identifier > 10.26797/rpye.v0i130.128 </ dc:identifier >
< dc:source lang =" en-US " > Politica y Estrategia Journal; Núm. 130 (2017); 13-55 </ dc:source >
< dc:source lang =" es-ES " > Revista Política y Estrategia; Núm. 130 (2017); 13-55 </ dc:source >
< dc:source > 0719-8027 </ dc:source >
< dc:source > 0716-7415 </ dc:source >
< dc:source > 10.26797/rpye.v0i130 </ dc:source >
< dc:language > spa </ dc:language >
< dc:relation > https://www.politicayestrategia.cl/index.php/rpye/article/view/128/236 </ dc:relation >
< dc:relation > https://www.politicayestrategia.cl/index.php/rpye/article/view/128/241 </ dc:relation >
< dc:rights lang =" es-ES " > Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Política y Estrategia </ dc:rights >
</ oai_dc:dc >
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
< record schemaLocation =" http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd " >
< leader > nmb a2200000Iu 4500 </ leader >
< controlfield tag =" 008 " > "171227 2017 eng " </ controlfield >
< datafield ind1 =" # " ind2 =" # " tag =" 022 " >
< subfield code =" $a " > 0719-8027 </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" # " ind2 =" # " tag =" 022 " >
< subfield code =" $a " > 0716-7415 </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 042 " >
< subfield code =" a " > dc </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" 0 " ind2 =" 0 " tag =" 245 " >
< subfield code =" a " > BOLIVIA EN 1904. ¿POR QUÉ FIRMA EL TRATADO CON CHILE? </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" 1 " ind2 =" " tag =" 720 " >
< subfield code =" a " > CORREA VERA, LORETO </ subfield >
< subfield code =" u " > ACADEMIA NACIONAL DE ESTUDIOS POLÍTICOS Y ESTRATÉGICOS (ANEPE) </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" 1 " ind2 =" " tag =" 720 " >
< subfield code =" a " > SALAS MATURANA, ALEJANDRO </ subfield >
< subfield code =" u " > ACADEMIA NACIONAL DE ESTUDIOS POLÍTICOS Y ESTRATÉGICOS (ANEPE) </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 653 " >
< subfield code =" a " > Tratado del Acre; Tratado de Paz de 1904; Bolivia; Ferrocarriles; Relaciones Internacionales </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 520 " >
< subfield code =" a " > This article demonstrates that Bolivia - despite the negotiations of 1895 and all the recent rhetoric - was not worried of the effective recovery of the coast until long after the signing of the 1904 Treaty, instead of that, the presidency of Ismael Montes and the rise of Liberals in the Bolivian state, prioritized the modernization of the country and the search for ways to get the production of tin at any cost, at that time, the main wealth of Bolivia. This text has the purpose of explaining –as a witness of the time-, what were the reasons that the Bolivian authorities wielded before their people to sign the Treaty of Peace with Chile. Following that logic and notwithstanding all the recent literature, it seems appropriate to go beyond the subjective line of interpretation to establish the sayings of the main actors. </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 260 " >
< subfield code =" b " > Academia Nacional de Estudios Políticos y Estratégicos </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< dataField ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 260 " >
< subfield code =" c " > 2017-12-27 00:00:00 </ subfield >
</ dataField >
< datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 856 " >
< subfield code =" q " > application/pdf </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 856 " >
< subfield code =" q " > text/html </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" 4 " ind2 =" 0 " tag =" 856 " >
< subfield code =" u " > https://www.politicayestrategia.cl/index.php/rpye/article/view/128 </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" 0 " ind2 =" " tag =" 786 " >
< subfield code =" n " > Revista Política y Estrategia; Núm. 130 (2017) </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 546 " >
< subfield code =" a " > eng </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 540 " >
< subfield code =" a " > Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Política y Estrategia </ subfield >
</ datafield >
</ record >
No es posible mostrar los datos del registro en esta vista. Si lo desea, puede descargarlos en el enlace anterior.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
< oai_marc catForm =" u " encLvl =" 3 " level =" m " status =" c " type =" a " schemaLocation =" http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/1.1/oai_marc http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/1.1/oai_marc.xsd " >
< fixfield id =" 008 " > "171227 2017 eng " </ fixfield >
< varfield ind1 =" # " ind2 =" # " tag =" 022 " >
< subfield label =" $a " > 0719-8027 </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield ind1 =" # " ind2 =" # " tag =" 022 " >
< subfield label =" $a " > 0716-7415 </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 042 " >
< subfield label =" a " > dc </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield ind1 =" 0 " ind2 =" 0 " tag =" 245 " >
< subfield label =" a " > BOLIVIA EN 1904. ¿POR QUÉ FIRMA EL TRATADO CON CHILE? </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield ind1 =" 1 " ind2 =" " tag =" 720 " >
< subfield label =" a " > CORREA VERA, LORETO </ subfield >
< subfield label =" u " > ACADEMIA NACIONAL DE ESTUDIOS POLÍTICOS Y ESTRATÉGICOS (ANEPE) </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield ind1 =" 1 " ind2 =" " tag =" 720 " >
< subfield label =" a " > SALAS MATURANA, ALEJANDRO </ subfield >
< subfield label =" u " > ACADEMIA NACIONAL DE ESTUDIOS POLÍTICOS Y ESTRATÉGICOS (ANEPE) </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 653 " >
< subfield label =" a " > Tratado del Acre; Tratado de Paz de 1904; Bolivia; Ferrocarriles; Relaciones Internacionales </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 520 " >
< subfield label =" a " > This article demonstrates that Bolivia - despite the negotiations of 1895 and all the recent rhetoric - was not worried of the effective recovery of the coast until long after the signing of the 1904 Treaty, instead of that, the presidency of Ismael Montes and the rise of Liberals in the Bolivian state, prioritized the modernization of the country and the search for ways to get the production of tin at any cost, at that time, the main wealth of Bolivia. This text has the purpose of explaining –as a witness of the time-, what were the reasons that the Bolivian authorities wielded before their people to sign the Treaty of Peace with Chile. Following that logic and notwithstanding all the recent literature, it seems appropriate to go beyond the subjective line of interpretation to establish the sayings of the main actors. </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 260 " >
< subfield label =" b " > Academia Nacional de Estudios Políticos y Estratégicos </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< dataField ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 260 " >
< subfield label =" c " > 2017-12-27 00:00:00 </ subfield >
</ dataField >
< varfield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 856 " >
< subfield label =" q " > application/pdf </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 856 " >
< subfield label =" q " > text/html </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield ind1 =" 4 " ind2 =" 0 " tag =" 856 " >
< subfield label =" u " > https://www.politicayestrategia.cl/index.php/rpye/article/view/128 </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield ind1 =" 0 " ind2 =" " tag =" 786 " >
< subfield label =" n " > Revista Política y Estrategia; Núm. 130 (2017) </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 546 " >
< subfield label =" a " > eng </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 540 " >
< subfield label =" a " > Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Política y Estrategia </ subfield >
</ varfield >
</ oai_marc >
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
< rfc1807 schemaLocation =" http://info.internet.isi.edu:80/in-notes/rfc/files/rfc1807.txt http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/1.1/rfc1807.xsd " >
< bib-version > v2 </ bib-version >
< id > https://www.politicayestrategia.cl/index.php/rpye/article/view/128 </ id >
< entry > 2019-12-31T22:25:51Z </ entry >
< organization > Revista Política y Estrategia </ organization >
< organization > Núm. 130 (2017); 13-55 </ organization >
< title > BOLIVIA EN 1904. ¿POR QUÉ FIRMA EL TRATADO CON CHILE? </ title >
< author > CORREA VERA, LORETO; ACADEMIA NACIONAL DE ESTUDIOS POLÍTICOS Y ESTRATÉGICOS (ANEPE) </ author >
< author > SALAS MATURANA, ALEJANDRO; ACADEMIA NACIONAL DE ESTUDIOS POLÍTICOS Y ESTRATÉGICOS (ANEPE) </ author >
< date > 2017-12-27 18:37:18 </ date >
< copyright > Los autores mantienen en todo momento los derechos sobre sus respectivos artículos, por otra parte, la Revista Política y Estrategia está distribuida bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional. </ copyright >
< other_access > url:https://www.politicayestrategia.cl/index.php/rpye/article/view/128 </ other_access >
< keyword > Tratado del Acre; Tratado de Paz de 1904; Bolivia; Ferrocarriles; Relaciones Internacionales </ keyword >
< language > es </ language >
< abstract > Este artículo demuestra que Bolivia no estuvo preocupada –pese a las negociaciones de 1895 y a toda la retórica reciente- de la recuperación efectiva del litoral sino hasta mucho después del rmado el Tratado de 1904. En efecto, la presidencia de Ismael Montes y el ascenso de los liberales en el Estado boliviano, priorizaron la modernización del país y la búsqueda de formas para sacar la producción de estaño a cualquier costo, por aquel entonces, la principal riqueza de Bolivia. Este texto tiene el propósito de explicar -cual ciudadano de la época-, cuáles fueron los motivos que las autoridades bolivianas esgrimieron ante la ciudadanía para rmar el Tratado de Paz con Chile. En esta línea, y no obstante toda la literatura reciente, nos parece oportuno traspasar la subjetiva línea de interpretación para establecer los dichos de los protagonistas. </ abstract >
</ rfc1807 >