<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
< oai_dc:dc schemaLocation =" http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd " >
< dc:title lang =" pt-PT " > Breaking Barriers With Qualitative Multi-Method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues! </ dc:title >
< dc:creator > Reis, João </ dc:creator >
< dc:creator > Amorim, Marlene </ dc:creator >
< dc:creator > Melão, Nuno </ dc:creator >
< dc:subject lang =" pt-PT " > Engineering </ dc:subject >
< dc:subject lang =" pt-PT " > Systematic literature review </ dc:subject >
< dc:subject lang =" pt-PT " > Multi-method approach </ dc:subject >
< dc:subject lang =" pt-PT " > Development </ dc:subject >
< dc:subject lang =" pt-PT " > Triangulation </ dc:subject >
< dc:subject lang =" pt-PT " > Complementarity </ dc:subject >
< dc:subject lang =" pt-PT " > Qualitative research </ dc:subject >
< dc:description lang =" pt-PT " > The purpose of this article is to investigate how contemporary studies about engineering are breaking down boundaries of knowledge. This study uses a systematic literature review to show how the application of qualitative multi-method approaches may offer reliable results and provide greater emphasis to the dimensions of development, triangulation and complementarity. The article offers new insights on the role of qualitative researches for the engineering domain, an area which has been largely unaddressed in the literature. </ dc:description >
< dc:publisher lang =" pt-PT " > Academia Militar </ dc:publisher >
< dc:date > 2017-01-01 </ dc:date >
< dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ dc:type >
< dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion </ dc:type >
< dc:type lang =" pt-PT " > Artigo Revisto por Pares </ dc:type >
< dc:format > application/pdf </ dc:format >
< dc:identifier > https://revistas.rcaap.pt/proelium/article/view/11930 </ dc:identifier >
< dc:source lang =" pt-PT " > PROELIUM; Vol. 7 (2017): Proelium N.º 12, Janeiro - Junho; 275-292 </ dc:source >
< dc:source > 1645-8826 </ dc:source >
< dc:language > por </ dc:language >
< dc:relation > https://revistas.rcaap.pt/proelium/article/view/11930/9091 </ dc:relation >
< dc:rights lang =" pt-PT " > Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 PROELIUM </ dc:rights >
</ oai_dc:dc >
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
< record schemaLocation =" http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd " >
< leader > nmb a2200000Iu 4500 </ leader >
< controlfield tag =" 008 " > "170101 2017 eng " </ controlfield >
< datafield ind1 =" # " ind2 =" # " tag =" 022 " >
< subfield code =" $a " > 1645-8826 </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 042 " >
< subfield code =" a " > dc </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" 0 " ind2 =" 0 " tag =" 245 " >
< subfield code =" a " > Breaking Barriers With Qualitative Multi-Method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues! </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" 1 " ind2 =" " tag =" 720 " >
< subfield code =" a " > Reis, João </ subfield >
< subfield code =" u " > CINAMIL - Centro de Investigação da Academia Militar </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" 1 " ind2 =" " tag =" 720 " >
< subfield code =" a " > Amorim, Marlene </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" 1 " ind2 =" " tag =" 720 " >
< subfield code =" a " > Melão, Nuno </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 520 " >
< subfield code =" a " > The purpose of this article is to investigate how contemporary studies about engineering are breaking down boundaries of knowledge. This study uses a systematic literature review to show how the application of qualitative multi-method approaches may offer reliable results and provide greater emphasis to the dimensions of development, triangulation and complementarity. The article offers new insights on the role of qualitative researches for the engineering domain, an area which has been largely unaddressed in the literature. </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 260 " >
< subfield code =" b " > Academia Militar </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< dataField ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 260 " >
< subfield code =" c " > 2017-03-27 00:00:00 </ subfield >
</ dataField >
< datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 856 " >
< subfield code =" q " > application/pdf </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" 4 " ind2 =" 0 " tag =" 856 " >
< subfield code =" u " > https://revistas.rcaap.pt/proelium/article/view/11930 </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" 0 " ind2 =" " tag =" 786 " >
< subfield code =" n " > PROELIUM; Vol. 7 (2017): Proelium N.º 12, Janeiro - Junho </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 546 " >
< subfield code =" a " > por </ subfield >
</ datafield >
< datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 540 " >
< subfield code =" a " > ##submission.copyrightStatement## </ subfield >
</ datafield >
</ record >
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
< oai_marc catForm =" u " encLvl =" 3 " level =" m " status =" c " type =" a " schemaLocation =" http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/1.1/oai_marc http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/1.1/oai_marc.xsd " >
< fixfield id =" 008 " > "170101 2017 eng " </ fixfield >
< varfield i1 =" # " i2 =" # " id =" 022 " >
< subfield label =" $a " > 1645-8826 </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield i1 =" " i2 =" " id =" 042 " >
< subfield label =" a " > dc </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield i1 =" 0 " i2 =" 0 " id =" 245 " >
< subfield label =" a " > Breaking Barriers With Qualitative Multi-Method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues! </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield i1 =" 1 " i2 =" " id =" 720 " >
< subfield label =" a " > Reis, João </ subfield >
< subfield label =" u " > CINAMIL - Centro de Investigação da Academia Militar </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield i1 =" 1 " i2 =" " id =" 720 " >
< subfield label =" a " > Amorim, Marlene </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield i1 =" 1 " i2 =" " id =" 720 " >
< subfield label =" a " > Melão, Nuno </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield i1 =" " i2 =" " id =" 520 " >
< subfield label =" a " > The purpose of this article is to investigate how contemporary studies about engineering are breaking down boundaries of knowledge. This study uses a systematic literature review to show how the application of qualitative multi-method approaches may offer reliable results and provide greater emphasis to the dimensions of development, triangulation and complementarity. The article offers new insights on the role of qualitative researches for the engineering domain, an area which has been largely unaddressed in the literature. </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield i1 =" " i2 =" " id =" 260 " >
< subfield label =" b " > Academia Militar </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield i1 =" " i2 =" " id =" 260 " >
< subfield label =" c " > 2017-03-27 00:00:00 </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield i1 =" " i2 =" " id =" 856 " >
< subfield label =" q " > application/pdf </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield i1 =" 4 " i2 =" 0 " id =" 856 " >
< subfield label =" u " > https://revistas.rcaap.pt/proelium/article/view/11930 </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield i1 =" 0 " i2 =" " id =" 786 " >
< subfield label =" n " > PROELIUM; Vol. 7 (2017): Proelium N.º 12, Janeiro - Junho </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield i1 =" " i2 =" " id =" 546 " >
< subfield label =" a " > por </ subfield >
</ varfield >
< varfield i1 =" " i2 =" " id =" 540 " >
< subfield label =" a " > ##submission.copyrightStatement## </ subfield >
</ varfield >
</ oai_marc >
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
< article article-type =" research-article " dtd-version =" 1.1d3 " lang =" pt " >
< front >
< journal-meta >
< journal-id journal-id-type =" ojs " > proelium </ journal-id >
< journal-title-group >
< journal-title lang =" pt " > PROELIUM </ journal-title >
< abbrev-journal-title lang =" pt " > PROELIUM </ abbrev-journal-title >
</ journal-title-group >
< issn pub-type =" ppub " > 1645-8826 </ issn >
< publisher >
< publisher-name > Academia Militar </ publisher-name >
</ publisher >
</ journal-meta >
< article-meta >
< article-id pub-id-type =" publisher-id " > 11930 </ article-id >
< article-categories >
< subj-group subj-group-type =" heading " lang =" pt_PT " >
< subject > Artigos </ subject >
</ subj-group >
</ article-categories >
< title-group >
< article-title lang =" pt " > Breaking Barriers With Qualitative Multi-Method Research for Engineering Studies: Pros, Cons and Issues! </ article-title >
</ title-group >
< contrib-group content-type =" author " >
< contrib >
< name name-style =" western " >
< surname > Reis </ surname >
< given-names > João </ given-names >
</ name >
</ contrib >
< contrib >
< name name-style =" western " >
< surname > Amorim </ surname >
< given-names > Marlene </ given-names >
</ name >
</ contrib >
< contrib >
< name name-style =" western " >
< surname > Melão </ surname >
< given-names > Nuno </ given-names >
</ name >
</ contrib >
</ contrib-group >
< aff id =" aff-1 " >
< institution content-type =" orgname " > CINAMIL - Centro de Investigação da Academia Militar </ institution >
</ aff >
< pub-date date-type =" pub " publication-format =" epub " >
< day > 01 </ day >
< month > 01 </ month >
< year > 2017 </ year >
</ pub-date >
< volume > 7 </ volume >
< fpage > 275 </ fpage >
< lpage > 292 </ lpage >
< permissions >
< copyright-statement > Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 PROELIUM </ copyright-statement >
< copyright-year > 2017 </ copyright-year >
< copyright-holder > PROELIUM </ copyright-holder >
</ permissions >
< kwd-group lang =" pt " >
< kwd > Engineering </ kwd >
< kwd > Systematic literature review </ kwd >
< kwd > Multi-method approach </ kwd >
< kwd > Development </ kwd >
< kwd > Triangulation </ kwd >
< kwd > Complementarity </ kwd >
< kwd > Qualitative research </ kwd >
</ kwd-group >
< abstract lang =" pt " >
< p > The purpose of this article is to investigate how contemporary studies about engineering are breaking down boundaries of knowledge. This study uses a systematic literature review to show how the application of qualitative multi-method approaches may offer reliable results and provide greater emphasis to the dimensions of development, triangulation and complementarity. The article offers new insights on the role of qualitative researches for the engineering domain, an area which has been largely unaddressed in the literature. </ p >
</ abstract >
< counts >
</ counts >
< custom-meta-group >
< custom-meta specific-use =" access-right " >
< meta-name > open access </ meta-name >
< meta-value > http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 </ meta-value >
</ custom-meta >
< custom-meta specific-use =" resource-type " >
< meta-name > journal article </ meta-name >
< meta-value > http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 </ meta-value >
</ custom-meta >
</ custom-meta-group >
</ article-meta >
</ front >
</ article >