Defesa digital: repositório de publicações de Defesa ibero-americanas

Español
Português

Está en:  › Datos de registro

Aplicación de la ley contra la pesca INDNR en el océano Atlántico sudoccidental: el desafío de 201 millas para la seguridad de los estados costeros

Identificadores del recurso

https://revistas.umng.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/7752

10.18359/ries.7752

Procedencia

(Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad)

Ficha

Título:: Aplicación de la ley contra la pesca INDNR en el océano Atlántico sudoccidental: el desafío de 201 millas para la seguridad de los estados costeros; Aplicação da lei contra a pesca INDNR no oceano Atlântico sudoeste: o desafio das 201 milhas para a segurança dos Estados costeiros
Tema:: derecho del mar; subvenciones a la pesca; 201 millas; pesca INDNR; océano Atlántico sudoccidental; direito do mar; subsídios à pesca; 201 milhas; oceano Atlântico sudoeste; Law of the Sea; Fisheries Subsidies; 201-Mile; IUU Fishing; Southwest Atlantic Ocean
Descripción:: The Southwest Atlantic Ocean is characterized by a lack of jurisdiction that prevents coastal and concerned States from taking the necessary enforcement measures to ensure sustainable fisheries in areas beyond national jurisdiction. In this context, where Distant-Water Fishing (DWF) fleet activities pose an increased risk of Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing—mainly supported by fisheries subsidies granted by flag States—this paper aims to analyze the implications of the absence of a regional mechanism to enforce international standards against IUU fishing in the Southwest Atlantic Ocean, and to explore possible actions that coastal States can undertake to promote fisheries enforcement across this critical area. The study demonstrates that the operations of DWF fleets have a significant impact on the livelihoods and security of coastal communities. Moreover, ongoing political disputes between Argentina and the United Kingdom regarding the Falkland/ Malvinas Islands have further hindered the enforcement of international fisheries regulations in áreas beyond national jurisdiction. In this context, the paper concludes that efforts to combat IUU fishing in the Southwest Atlantic Ocean are severely constrained by the lack of a regional enforcement framework. The recently adopted Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies is highlighted as a promising step toward addressing the regulatory void that currently prevents the effective implementation of widely accepted fisheries governance standards in the region.; El océano Atlántico sudoccidental se caracteriza por una falta de jurisdicción que impide a los Estados costeros y a los Estados interesados adoptar las medidas coercitivas necesarias para garantizar la sostenibilidad de la pesca en zonas que se encuentran fuera de la jurisdicción nacional. En este contexto, donde las actividades de la flota de pesca de altura (DWF) representan un mayor riesgo de pesca ilegal, no declarada y no reglamentada (INDNR) —principalmente respaldada por subsidios a la pesca otorgados por los Estados del pabellón— este documento tiene como objetivo analizar las implicaciones de la ausencia de un mecanismo regional para hacer cumplir las normas internacionales contra la pesca INDNR en el Océano Atlántico sudoccidental y explorar posibles accione que los Estados costeros pueden emprender para promover la aplicación de la normativa pesquera en esta zona crítica. El estudio demuestra que las operaciones de las flotas de pesca de arrastre tienen un impacto significativo en los medios de subsistencia y la seguridad de las comunidades costeras. Además, las disputas políticas entre Argentina y el Reino Unido sobre las Islas Malvinas han dificultado aún más la aplicación de las normas internacionales de pesca en zonas fuera de la jurisdicción nacional. En este contexto, el documento concluye que los esfuerzos para combatir la pesca INDNR (ilegal, no declarada y no reglamentada) en el Atlántico sudoccidental se ven seriamente limitados por la falta de un marco regional de aplicación de la ley. El Acuerdo sobre Subvenciones a la Pesca, recientemente adoptado, se destaca como un paso prometedor para abordar el vacío regulatorio que actualmente impide la aplicación efectiva de estándares de gobernanza pesquera ampliamente aceptados en la región.; O oceano Atlântico sudoeste é caracterizado por uma falta de jurisdição que impede os Estados costeiros e os Estados interessados de adotar as medidas coercitivas necessárias para garantir a sustentabilidade da pesca em zonas que se encontram fora da jurisdição nacional. Nesse contexto, em que as atividades da frota de pesca em alto-mar (DWF) representam um risco maior de pesca ilegal, não declarada e não regulamentada (INDNR) — principalmente apoiada por subsidios à pesca concedidos pelos Estados de bandeira — este artigo tem como objetivo analisar as implicações da ausência de um mecanismo regional para fazer cumprir as normas internacionais contra a pesca INDNR no oceano Atlântico sudoeste e explorar possíveis ações que os Estados costeiros podem adotar para promover a aplicação da regulamentação pesqueira nessa zona crítica. O estudo demonstra que as operações das frotas de pesca de arrasto têm um impacto significativo nos meios de subsistência e na segurança das comunidades costeiras. Além disso, as disputas políticas entre a Argentina e o Reino Unido sobre as Ilhas Malvinas dificultaram ainda mais a aplicação das normas internacionais de pesca em zonas fora da jurisdição nacional. Nesse contexto, o artigo conclui que os esforços para combater a pesca INDNR (ilegal, não declarada e não regulamentada) no Atlântico 117 sudoeste são seriamente limitados pela falta de um marco regional de aplicação da lei. O Acordo sobre Subsídios à Pesca, recentemente adotado, destaca-se como um passo promissor para enfrentar o vazio regulatório que atualmente impede a aplicação efetiva de padrões amplamente aceitos de governança pesqueira na região.
Fuente:: Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2025); 115 - 133; Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; Vol. 20 Núm. 2 (2025); 115 - 133; Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; v. 20 n. 2 (2025); 115 - 133; 1909-7743; 1909-3063
Idioma:: English
Relación:: https://revistas.umng.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/7752/6735; /*ref*/Argentina, Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos (1997). Ley 24.922. http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/45000-49999/48357/texact.htm; /*ref*/Argentina (2008). Plan de Acción Nacional para Prevenir, Desalentar y Eliminar la Pesca Ilegal, No Declarada, No Reglamentada. https://www.magyp.gob.ar/sitio/areas/pesca_maritima/plan/PAN-INDNR/PANpescailegal.pdf; /*ref*/Arpi, B. & McGee, J. (2022). Fishing around the South Georgia Islands and the ‘Question of the Flklandss/Malvinas’: Unprecedented challenges for the Antarctic Treaty System. Marine Policy, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105201; /*ref*/Baird, R. (2004). ILLEGAL, UNREPORTED AND UNREGULATED FISHING: AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEGAL, ECONOMIC AND HISTORICAL FACTORS RELEVANT TO ITS DEVELOPMENT AND PERSISTENCE. 299–334. http://www.ccamlr.org/pu/E/pubs/cr/97/cc-xvi-all.pdf; /*ref*/Barretto, R. Z. (2021). A Argentina e a Defesa da Milha 201: pesca predatória e jurisdição do estado costeiro em alto mar. En W. Menezes (Ed.), DIREITO INTERNACIONAL EM EXPANSÃO: direito internacional e pluralismo, 477–497. Belo Horizonte, Brasil: Arraes Editores.; /*ref*/Brasil (1999). Lei Complementar No. 97, Câmara dos Deputados (1999). https://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/fed/leicom/1999/leicomplementar-97-9-junho-1999-377583-normaatualizada-pl.pdf; /*ref*/Brasil (2006). Programa Nacional de Rastreamento de Embarcações Pesqueiras por Satélite - PREPS. Instrução Normativa SEAP/MMA/MD N° 02, de 04 de setembro de 2006. https://www.icmbio.gov.br/cepsul/images/stories/legislacao/Instrucao_normativa/2006/in_seap_mma_md_02_2006_preps.pdf; /*ref*/Brasil (2017). Estado Maior da Armada. Doutrina Militar Naval, No. EMA-305,.; /*ref*/Brasil (2020). Decreto No 10.544: Aprova o X Plano Setorial para os Recursos do Mar https://doi.org/10.544; /*ref*/Brasil (2022). Relatório de Gestão. https://www.marinha.mil.br/relatorio-de-gestao; /*ref*/Círculo de Políticas Ambientales (2023). Prohibición de Subvenciones a la Pesca Destructiva. https://circulodepoliticasambientales.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Acuerdo-Subvenciones-a-la-Pesca-OMC-Ratificacion.pdf; /*ref*/Comisión Técnica Mixta del Frente Marítimo CTMFM (2021). 34a COFI Meeting: Declaración. https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/COFI/COFI34/observers/GeneralStatement-; /*ref*/CTMFM_es.pdf#:~:text=La%20CTMFM%20fue%20establecida%20por%20el%20Tratado%20del,Com%C3%BAn%20de%20Pesca%20entre%20Uruguay%20y%20Argentina%20%28ZCPAU%29.; /*ref*/Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna CCSBT (2024). The Commission’s Role. https://www.ccsbt.org/en/content/commissions-role; /*ref*/DuPrey Diederichsen, S., Decker Sardinha, G., Eymael Garcia Scherer, M. & Nicolodi, J. L. (2024). Opportunities to overcome the Ocean Decade Challenges in Brazil’s ocean and coastal governance system. Ocean and Coastal Management, 247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106907; /*ref*/FAO (2001). International plan of action to prevent, deter, and eliminate illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing, 24. https://www.fao.org/3/Y1224E/y1224e.pdf; /*ref*/FAO (2009). Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing. https://www.fao.org/port-State-measures/en; /*ref*/FAO (2017). Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Statistics and Information Service. FishStatJ: Universal software for fishery statistical time series (4.02.04). https://www.fao.org/fishery/en/statistics/software/fishstatj/en; /*ref*/FAO (2022). Mapping distant-water fisheries access arrangements. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1252. Rome. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4060/cc2545en; /*ref*/Ferreira, L. V. (2018). The Securitization of IUU Fishing in the Southern Ocean. Caderno de Relações Internacionais, v. 9, p. 215-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22293/2179-1376.v9i16.704; /*ref*/Fish Information and Services FIS (2023). The fishing effort of the Chinese fleet in the South Atlantic multiplied by eight in ten years. Sea Food Media Group. http://www.fis-net.com/fis/worldnews/worldnews.asp?monthyear=7-2023andday=24andid=124908andl=eandcountry=0andspecial=andndb=1anddf=0; /*ref*/Goldaracena, S. (2021). Uruguay wants to work with Argentina and Brazil to protect migratory fish populations. China Dialogue Ocean. https://chinadialogueocean.net/16753-uruguay-work-with-argentina-brazil-protect-migratory-fish/; /*ref*/Haas, B., McGee, J., Fleming, A. & Haward, M. (2020). Factors influencing the performance of regional fisheries management organizations. Marine Policy, 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103787; /*ref*/Koop, F. (2024). Fisheries subsidies: ‘We have let history down.’ Dialogue Earth. https://dialogue.earth/en/ocean/; /*ref*/MESQUITA, J. L. (2021). Polo pesqueiro chinês em Rio Grande, proposta indecente. Mar Sem Fim. https://marsemfim.com.br/polo-pesqueiro-chines-em-rio-grande-proposta-indecente/; /*ref*/Miller, D. G. M., Slicer, N. M. & Sabourenkov, E. (2014). An action framework to address Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) fishing. Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs, 6(2), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2014.912575; /*ref*/Montecalvo, I., Le Billon, P., Arsenault, C. & Schvartzman, M. (2023). Ocean predators: Squids, Chinese fleets and the geopolitics of high seas fishing. Marine Policy, 152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105584; /*ref*/Neto, J. B. G., Goyanna, F. A. de A., Feitosa, C. V. & Soares, M. O. (2021). A sleeping giant: the historically neglected Brazilian fishing sector. Ocean and Coastal Management, 209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105699; /*ref*/Oceana (2022). Brasil ignora a pesca como fonte de emprego e renda. https://brasil.oceana.org/comunicados/brasil-ignora-a-pesca-como-fonte-de-emprego-e-renda/; /*ref*/Ortega, F. E. (2021). Bajo un mismo Sol y sobre un mismo mar. Disputas geoestratégicas y en torno a los recursos pesqueros en Malvinas y el Atlántico Sur (2015-2021): XXII Jornadas de Investigación y Enseñanza de la Geografía. https://memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/; /*ref*/Palma-Robles, M. A. (2016). Fisheries Enforcement and the Concepts of Compliance and Monitoring, Control and Surveillance. En R. Warner & S. Kaye (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Maritime Regulation and Enforcement (139–160). Abingdon: Routledge.; /*ref*/Pará (2023). Secretaria de Planejamento e Administração. Comitiva Chinesa Visita Sedap Para Futuro Intercâmbio Na Cadeia Pesqueira. https://seplad.pa.gov.br/2023/06/22/comitiva-chinesa-visita-sedap-para-futuro-intercambio-na--cadeia-pesqueira/; /*ref*/Pedrozo, R. (2022). China’s IUU Fishing Fleet: Pariah of the World’s Oceans. International Law Studies, 99(319), 320–353. https://www.iuufishingindex.net/; /*ref*/Pereira, R. (2019). O que é a Amazônia Azul e por que o Brasil quer se tornar potência militar no Atlântico. Gazeta Do Povo. https://www.gazetadopovo.com.br/republica/amazonia-azul-brasil-potencia-militar-atlantico/; /*ref*/Perez, J. G. (2020). The Flklandss/Malvinas conflict from the perspective of the Geopolitics of Natural Resources. Coleção Meira Mattos. https://doi.org/10.22491/cmm.a036; /*ref*/Poling, G. B. and Cronin, C. (2017). Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing as a National Security Threat. www.csis.org; /*ref*/Poseidon Aquatic Resource Management Ltd & Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime (2022). IUU Fishing Index. https://www.iuufishingindex.net/; /*ref*/República Argentina (2016). La Cuestión de la Milla 201: La pesca de especies migratorias fuera de la ZEE argentina. Boletín Del Centro Naval, 134(842), 107–109. file:///C:/Users/cpino/AppData/Local/Temp/MicrosoftEdgeDownloads/8f18a31c-3a6c-4367-9171-64e9a5ff8cfb/BCN-0842.pdf; /*ref*/Rochette, J., Billé, R., Molenaar, E. J., Drankier, P. & Chabason, L. (2015). Regional oceans governance mechanisms: A review. Marine Policy, 60, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.05.012; /*ref*/Rosello, M. (2021). IUU fishing as a flag State accountability paradigm : between effectiveness and legitimacy (Vol. 45). Brill Nijhoff.; /*ref*/RPS Submitter & Crime (2022). IUU Fishing Crimes in Latin America and the Caribbean. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4200724; /*ref*/Santa Catarina (2021). Santa Catarina atrai interesse da Espanha para investimentos e parceria internacional. Agência Catarinense de Notícias. https://estado.sc.gov.br/noticias/santa-catarina-atrai-interesse-da-espanha-para-investimentos-e-parceria-internacional/; /*ref*/Schaeffer, D. (2021). Fishing for Security. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/jgi_research; /*ref*/Stäbler, M., Letschert, J., Fujitani, M. & Partelow, S. (2022). Fish grabbing: Weak governance and productive waters are targets for distant water fishing. PLoS ONE, 17(12 December). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278481; /*ref*/Stefanus, A. A. & Vervaele, J. A. E. (2021). Fishy business: regulatory and enforcement challenges of transnational organised IUU fishing crimes. Trends in Organized Crime, 24(4), 581–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-021-09425-y; /*ref*/The International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas ICCAT (2024). ICCAT Basic Texts. https://www.iccat.int/Documents/Commission/BasicTexts.pdf; /*ref*/United Nations (1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. https://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf; /*ref*/United Nations (1995). Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 Relating to the Conservation And Management of Straddling Fish Stocks And Highly Migratory Fish Stocks. https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/aipuncls/aipuncls.html; /*ref*/United Nations General Assembly (2008). Oceans and the law of the sea: Report of the Secretary-General No. Res. A/63/63. https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/48da24e72.pdf; /*ref*/Uruguay (2023). Auditoria Interna de la Nación.. Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos (DINARA): Informe de Auditoría. https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-economia-finanzas/sites/ministerio-economia-finanzas/files/documentos/publicaciones/2023-MinisteriodeGanaderiaAgriculturayPesca_DireccionNacionaldeRecursosAcuaticos.pdf; /*ref*/Uruguay (2023a). Ministerio de Ganadería, A. y P. Pesca Ilegal: Uruguay y Ecuador unen esfuerzos a través de un MOU para combatir la pesca ilegal. https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-ganaderia-agricultura-pesca/comunicacion/noticias/uruguay-ecuador-unen-esfuerzos-traves-mou-para-combatir-pesca-ilegal; /*ref*/Weis, V. V. (2023). La Prefectura Naval Argentina y el «Cambio de Paradigma» en la Persecución de la Pesca Ilegal. Una mirada desde las Criminologías Verde y Azul. Delito y Sociedad, 55, e0082. https://doi.org/10.14409/dys.2023.55.e0082; /*ref*/Warikandwa, T. V. (2023). Fighting fisheries crimes in the fisheries industry: Practical training reflections of the efficacy of Namibia’s fisheries law enforcement. Cogent Social Sciences, v. 9, n. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2286043
Autor/Productor:: Pacheco Piñon, Charles; Panno Beirão, André
Editor:: Universidad Militar Nueva Granada
Derechos:: Derechos de autor 2025 Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Fecha:: 2025-12-24
Tipo de recurso:: info:eu-repo/semantics/article; info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Formato:: application/pdf

oai_dc

Descargar XML

No es posible mostrar los datos del registro en esta vista. Si lo desea, puede descargarlos en el enlace anterior.

marcxml

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< record schemaLocation =" http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim https://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd " >
1. < leader > nmb a2200000Iu 4500 </ leader >
2. < controlfield tag =" 008 " > "251224 2025 eng " </ controlfield >
3. < datafield ind1 =" # " ind2 =" # " tag =" 022 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > 1909-7743 </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
4. < datafield ind1 =" # " ind2 =" # " tag =" 022 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > 1909-3063 </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
5. < datafield ind1 =" 7 " ind2 =" # " tag =" 024 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > 10.18359/ries.7752 </ subfield >
  2. < subfield code =" 2 " > doi </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
6. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 042 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > dc </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
7. < datafield ind1 =" 0 " ind2 =" 0 " tag =" 245 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > Aplicación de la ley contra la pesca INDNR en el océano Atlántico sudoccidental: el desafío de 201 millas para la seguridad de los estados costeros </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
8. < datafield ind1 =" 1 " ind2 =" " tag =" 720 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > Pacheco Piñon, Charles </ subfield >
  2. < subfield code =" u " > Brazilian Naval War College (PPGEM/EGN), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil </ subfield >
  3. < subfield code =" 0 " > https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4231-1371 </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
9. < datafield ind1 =" 1 " ind2 =" " tag =" 720 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > Panno Beirão, André </ subfield >
  2. < subfield code =" u " > Brazilian Naval War College (PPGEM/EGN), Rio de Janeiro, Brazi </ subfield >
  3. < subfield code =" 0 " > https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3600-8242 </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
10. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 520 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > The Southwest Atlantic Ocean is characterized by a lack of jurisdiction that prevents coastal and concerned States from taking the necessary enforcement measures to ensure sustainable fisheries in areas beyond national jurisdiction. In this context, where Distant-Water Fishing (DWF) fleet activities pose an increased risk of Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing—mainly supported by fisheries subsidies granted by flag States—this paper aims to analyze the implications of the absence of a regional mechanism to enforce international standards against IUU fishing in the Southwest Atlantic Ocean, and to explore possible actions that coastal States can undertake to promote fisheries enforcement across this critical area. The study demonstrates that the operations of DWF fleets have a significant impact on the livelihoods and security of coastal communities. Moreover, ongoing political disputes between Argentina and the United Kingdom regarding the Falkland/ Malvinas Islands have further hindered the enforcement of international fisheries regulations in áreas beyond national jurisdiction. In this context, the paper concludes that efforts to combat IUU fishing in the Southwest Atlantic Ocean are severely constrained by the lack of a regional enforcement framework. The recently adopted Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies is highlighted as a promising step toward addressing the regulatory void that currently prevents the effective implementation of widely accepted fisheries governance standards in the region. </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
11. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 260 " >
  1. < subfield code =" b " > Universidad Militar Nueva Granada </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
12. < dataField ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 260 " >
  1. < subfield code =" c " > 2025-12-24 00:00:00 </ subfield >
  </ dataField >
13. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 856 " >
  1. < subfield code =" q " > application/pdf </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
14. < datafield ind1 =" 4 " ind2 =" 0 " tag =" 856 " >
  1. < subfield code =" u " > https://revistas.umng.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/7752 </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
15. < datafield ind1 =" 0 " ind2 =" " tag =" 786 " >
  1. < subfield code =" n " > Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; Vol. 20 Núm. 2 (2025) </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
16. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 546 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > eng </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
17. < datafield ind1 =" " ind2 =" " tag =" 540 " >
  1. < subfield code =" a " > Derechos de autor 2025 Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad </ subfield >
  </ datafield >
</ record >

oai_marc

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< oai_marc catForm =" u " encLvl =" 3 " level =" m " status =" c " type =" a " schemaLocation =" http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/1.1/oai_marc http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/1.1/oai_marc.xsd " >
1. < fixfield id =" 008 " > "251224 2025 eng " </ fixfield >
2. < varfield i1 =" # " i2 =" # " id =" 022 " >
  1. < subfield label =" $a " > 1909-7743 </ subfield >
  </ varfield >
3. < varfield i1 =" # " i2 =" # " id =" 022 " >
  1. < subfield label =" $a " > 1909-3063 </ subfield >
  </ varfield >
4. < varfield i1 =" " i2 =" " id =" 042 " >
  1. < subfield label =" a " > dc </ subfield >
  </ varfield >
5. < varfield i1 =" 0 " i2 =" 0 " id =" 245 " >
  1. < subfield label =" a " > Aplicación de la ley contra la pesca INDNR en el océano Atlántico sudoccidental: el desafío de 201 millas para la seguridad de los estados costeros </ subfield >
  </ varfield >
6. < varfield i1 =" 1 " i2 =" " id =" 720 " >
  1. < subfield label =" a " > Pacheco Piñon, Charles </ subfield >
  2. < subfield label =" u " > Brazilian Naval War College (PPGEM/EGN), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil </ subfield >
  3. < subfield label =" 0 " > https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4231-1371 </ subfield >
  </ varfield >
7. < varfield i1 =" 1 " i2 =" " id =" 720 " >
  1. < subfield label =" a " > Panno Beirão, André </ subfield >
  2. < subfield label =" u " > Brazilian Naval War College (PPGEM/EGN), Rio de Janeiro, Brazi </ subfield >
  3. < subfield label =" 0 " > https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3600-8242 </ subfield >
  </ varfield >
8. < varfield i1 =" " i2 =" " id =" 520 " >
  1. < subfield label =" a " > The Southwest Atlantic Ocean is characterized by a lack of jurisdiction that prevents coastal and concerned States from taking the necessary enforcement measures to ensure sustainable fisheries in areas beyond national jurisdiction. In this context, where Distant-Water Fishing (DWF) fleet activities pose an increased risk of Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing—mainly supported by fisheries subsidies granted by flag States—this paper aims to analyze the implications of the absence of a regional mechanism to enforce international standards against IUU fishing in the Southwest Atlantic Ocean, and to explore possible actions that coastal States can undertake to promote fisheries enforcement across this critical area. The study demonstrates that the operations of DWF fleets have a significant impact on the livelihoods and security of coastal communities. Moreover, ongoing political disputes between Argentina and the United Kingdom regarding the Falkland/ Malvinas Islands have further hindered the enforcement of international fisheries regulations in áreas beyond national jurisdiction. In this context, the paper concludes that efforts to combat IUU fishing in the Southwest Atlantic Ocean are severely constrained by the lack of a regional enforcement framework. The recently adopted Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies is highlighted as a promising step toward addressing the regulatory void that currently prevents the effective implementation of widely accepted fisheries governance standards in the region. </ subfield >
  </ varfield >
9. < varfield i1 =" " i2 =" " id =" 260 " >
  1. < subfield label =" b " > Universidad Militar Nueva Granada </ subfield >
  </ varfield >
10. < varfield i1 =" " i2 =" " id =" 260 " >
  1. < subfield label =" c " > 2025-12-24 00:00:00 </ subfield >
  </ varfield >
11. < varfield i1 =" " i2 =" " id =" 856 " >
  1. < subfield label =" q " > application/pdf </ subfield >
  </ varfield >
12. < varfield i1 =" 4 " i2 =" 0 " id =" 856 " >
  1. < subfield label =" u " > https://revistas.umng.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/7752 </ subfield >
  </ varfield >
13. < varfield i1 =" 0 " i2 =" " id =" 786 " >
  1. < subfield label =" n " > Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad; Vol. 20 Núm. 2 (2025) </ subfield >
  </ varfield >
14. < varfield i1 =" " i2 =" " id =" 546 " >
  1. < subfield label =" a " > eng </ subfield >
  </ varfield >
15. < varfield i1 =" " i2 =" " id =" 540 " >
  1. < subfield label =" a " > Derechos de autor 2025 Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad </ subfield >
  </ varfield >
</ oai_marc >

rfc1807

Descargar XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

< rfc1807 schemaLocation =" http://info.internet.isi.edu:80/in-notes/rfc/files/rfc1807.txt http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/1.1/rfc1807.xsd " >
1. < bib-version > v2 </ bib-version >
2. < id > https://revistas.umng.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/7752 </ id >
3. < entry > 2025-12-31T03:56:52Z </ entry >
4. < organization > Universidad Militar Nueva Granada </ organization >
5. < organization > Vol. 20 Núm. 2 (2025); 115 - 133 </ organization >
6. < title > Aplicación de la ley contra la pesca INDNR en el océano Atlántico sudoccidental: el desafío de 201 millas para la seguridad de los estados costeros </ title >
7. < type />
8. < author > Pacheco Piñon, Charles; Brazilian Naval War College (PPGEM/EGN), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil </ author >
9. < author > Panno Beirão, André; Brazilian Naval War College (PPGEM/EGN), Rio de Janeiro, Brazi </ author >
10. < date > 2025-12-24 </ date >
11. < copyright />
12. < other_access > url:https://revistas.umng.edu.co/index.php/ries/article/view/7752 </ other_access >
13. < keyword > derecho del mar </ keyword >
14. < keyword > subvenciones a la pesca </ keyword >
15. < keyword > 201 millas </ keyword >
16. < keyword > pesca INDNR </ keyword >
17. < keyword > océano Atlántico sudoccidental </ keyword >
18. < language > en_US </ language >
19. < abstract > El océano Atlántico sudoccidental se caracteriza por una falta de jurisdicción que impide a los Estados costeros y a los Estados interesados adoptar las medidas coercitivas necesarias para garantizar la sostenibilidad de la pesca en zonas que se encuentran fuera de la jurisdicción nacional. En este contexto, donde las actividades de la flota de pesca de altura (DWF) representan un mayor riesgo de pesca ilegal, no declarada y no reglamentada (INDNR) —principalmente respaldada por subsidios a la pesca otorgados por los Estados del pabellón— este documento tiene como objetivo analizar las implicaciones de la ausencia de un mecanismo regional para hacer cumplir las normas internacionales contra la pesca INDNR en el Océano Atlántico sudoccidental y explorar posibles accione que los Estados costeros pueden emprender para promover la aplicación de la normativa pesquera en esta zona crítica. El estudio demuestra que las operaciones de las flotas de pesca de arrastre tienen un impacto significativo en los medios de subsistencia y la seguridad de las comunidades costeras. Además, las disputas políticas entre Argentina y el Reino Unido sobre las Islas Malvinas han dificultado aún más la aplicación de las normas internacionales de pesca en zonas fuera de la jurisdicción nacional. En este contexto, el documento concluye que los esfuerzos para combatir la pesca INDNR (ilegal, no declarada y no reglamentada) en el Atlántico sudoccidental se ven seriamente limitados por la falta de un marco regional de aplicación de la ley. El Acuerdo sobre Subvenciones a la Pesca, recientemente adoptado, se destaca como un paso prometedor para abordar el vacío regulatorio que actualmente impide la aplicación efectiva de estándares de gobernanza pesquera ampliamente aceptados en la región. </ abstract >
</ rfc1807 >