• OAI
  • RSS
  • Mapa del portal
  • Español
  • Português
Logo Ministerio de Defensa Defesa digital: repositório de publicações de Defesa ibero-americanas
  • Inicio
  • Pesquisa
  • Diretório
  • Sobre
Está en:  › Datos de registro
Linked Open Data
ANÁLISIS COMPARATIVO DE LOS IMPACTOS AMBIENTALES ENTRE PROYECTOS SOBRE EXTRACTORAS DE PALMA AFRICANA
Identificadores del recurso
https://journal.espe.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/revista-seguridad-defensa/article/view/RCSDV2N3ART5
10.24133/rcsd.v2n3.2017.05
Procedencia
(Revista de Ciencias de Seguridad y Defensa.)

Ficha

Título:
ANÁLISIS COMPARATIVO DE LOS IMPACTOS AMBIENTALES ENTRE PROYECTOS SOBRE EXTRACTORAS DE PALMA AFRICANA
Descripción:
The development of african palm plantations poses significant environmental problems such as: threat against  forests,  intensive  use  of  chemical  inputs,  impact  on  biodiversity  and  impact  on  humans.  All productive activity generates environmental impacts, these can be positive or negative, so it is necessary to determine and identify what these impacts are, to prevent, mitigate, or remedy to be the case. The target of bibliographic research was to know and identify the most relevant possible environmental impacts both  positive  and  negative  in  its  different  main  actions  for  the  extraction  of  african  palm  oil  in  order to  perform  a  complete comparative  analysis  of  the environmental impacts.  The  Impact  Assessment  in the collected studies was performed using the matrices Identification (Leopold Matrix), Evaluation and Environmental Impacts results. The extractor Palmeras Mariangel Manabi SA submitted a total of 169 and 28 environmental impacts respectively. Finally it was determined that the enviromental factors more disadvantaged and matching in both studies are: affecting groundwater, erosion and soil destruction and alteration of flora and fauna. Moreover the environmental factors more beneficiaries are: job creation, improving the local economy of the zone of the extractor and improving basic services.
Fuente:
Revista de Ciencias de Seguridad y Defensa; Vol. 2 Núm. 3 (2017): Revista de Ciencias de Seguridad y Defensa Vol 2 Número 3 - 2017; 8
2477-9253
Idioma:
English
Relación:
https://journal.espe.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/revista-seguridad-defensa/article/view/RCSDV2N3ART5/pdf
Autor/Productor:
ARELLANO, JHON
Editor:
UNIVERSIDAD DE LAS FUERZAS ARMADAS ESPE
Derechos:
Derechos de autor 2017 Revista de Ciencias de Seguridad y Defensa
Fecha:
2021-05-26
Tipo de recurso:
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artículo revisado por pares
Formato:
application/pdf

oai_dc

Descargar XML

    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

  1. < oai_dc:dc schemaLocation =" http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd " >

    1. < dc:title lang =" en " > ANÁLISIS COMPARATIVO DE LOS IMPACTOS AMBIENTALES ENTRE PROYECTOS SOBRE EXTRACTORAS DE PALMA AFRICANA </ dc:title >

    2. < dc:creator lang =" en " > ARELLANO, JHON </ dc:creator >

    3. < dc:description lang =" en " > The development of african palm plantations poses significant environmental problems such as: threat against  forests,  intensive  use  of  chemical  inputs,  impact  on  biodiversity  and  impact  on  humans.  All productive activity generates environmental impacts, these can be positive or negative, so it is necessary to determine and identify what these impacts are, to prevent, mitigate, or remedy to be the case. The target of bibliographic research was to know and identify the most relevant possible environmental impacts both  positive  and  negative  in  its  different  main  actions  for  the  extraction  of  african  palm  oil  in  order to  perform  a  complete comparative  analysis  of  the environmental impacts.  The  Impact  Assessment  in the collected studies was performed using the matrices Identification (Leopold Matrix), Evaluation and Environmental Impacts results. The extractor Palmeras Mariangel Manabi SA submitted a total of 169 and 28 environmental impacts respectively. Finally it was determined that the enviromental factors more disadvantaged and matching in both studies are: affecting groundwater, erosion and soil destruction and alteration of flora and fauna. Moreover the environmental factors more beneficiaries are: job creation, improving the local economy of the zone of the extractor and improving basic services. </ dc:description >

    4. < dc:publisher lang =" es " > UNIVERSIDAD DE LAS FUERZAS ARMADAS ESPE </ dc:publisher >

    5. < dc:date > 2021-05-26 </ dc:date >

    6. < dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/article </ dc:type >

    7. < dc:type > info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion </ dc:type >

    8. < dc:type lang =" es " > Artículo revisado por pares </ dc:type >

    9. < dc:format > application/pdf </ dc:format >

    10. < dc:identifier > https://journal.espe.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/revista-seguridad-defensa/article/view/RCSDV2N3ART5 </ dc:identifier >

    11. < dc:identifier > 10.24133/rcsd.v2n3.2017.05 </ dc:identifier >

    12. < dc:source lang =" es " > Revista de Ciencias de Seguridad y Defensa; Vol. 2 Núm. 3 (2017): Revista de Ciencias de Seguridad y Defensa Vol 2 Número 3 - 2017; 8 </ dc:source >

    13. < dc:source > 2477-9253 </ dc:source >

    14. < dc:language > eng </ dc:language >

    15. < dc:relation > https://journal.espe.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/revista-seguridad-defensa/article/view/RCSDV2N3ART5/pdf </ dc:relation >

    16. < dc:rights lang =" es " > Derechos de autor 2017 Revista de Ciencias de Seguridad y Defensa </ dc:rights >

    </ oai_dc:dc >

  • © Ministerio de Defensa de España
  • repositório OAI
  • Accesibilidad
  • Aviso legal
  • 
  • 